| 摘要 |
The claimed Innovation Expert System, IES, and for a given innovation/invention the claimed Data Structure DS-structurally being the same for any innovation/invention-meet two kinds of functional requirements. They support: (I) determining all the innovation's/invention's technical/legal relations to given prior art information, (II) instantly recognizing and answering any reasonable query about any such relation alias fact. Functionality (I) enables generating/providing functionality (II)-jointly implemented by IES and DS, also usable by other expert systems. DS results from screening the innovation for technical/legal informal fundamental facts, transforming them into technical/legal formal fundamental facts, these into technical/legal primary facts, these into technical/legal secondary semantic/creative/inventive and pragmatic facts, and these into argument chains being the final technical/legal facts. All facts use the number and kinds of independent creative/inventive concepts alias thoughts needed for finding/qualifying the invention over prior art, as induced by HIGHEST COURTS of Germany and recently the US.
|
